Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sheri Rypstra's avatar

Wonderfully written and truthful. I find it lines up exactly with what I've been shown over the past few months. There are obviously 2 spiritual forces. The vortex or storm is getting all the attention. It not only sends out chaos via spinning arms likened to the spokes of a wagon wheel in motion, but internally, the vortex is centripetal, with and an ever increasing oppressive force.

Once I understood this, I was backed off to see the 'cross' force, that precedes the vortex, flows across the storm and continues after the storm. It is steady and eternal. Afterwards I was shown it in picture format which I won't go into here and now...but imagine my surprise, when a month later, I discovered the same 'picture' described at the end of chapter 5 in the Wisdom of Solomon!!

I find it exceedingly interesting that you've described this above: just from the opposite view...how our culture is in essence cutting across the ancient flow of energy that is eternal, from the Father of Heavenly Lights! The force it is following will end in it's destruction, to all who are driven by the vortex/storm's winds.

One question. The more I read the 'lost' books, the more I desire a Strong's concordance/dictionary equivalent for these books. Is there one easily available you would recommend? I must admit to not searching overly hard for one yet, but hoping there is such an accompanying book.

Noel Bagwell's avatar

There is something bracing and attractive in your insistence that modern man is not saved by novelty, that extraction is real, that human beings are being flattened into inputs and outputs, and that older wisdom speaks with a steadier voice than trending opinion. On that much, faithful Christianity can nod in agreement. The Church has been warning about disordered appetites, false freedoms, and soul-shrinking systems since long before the first server rack began humming.

But truth deserves not only passion... it deserves proportion. And your thesis, like a sword swung too widely, cuts some genuine enemies and several innocent bystanders at the same stroke.

You present “ancient wisdom” as the only weapon left, and then quietly redefine that wisdom as a particular enlarged canon plus a total explanatory framework of hierarchy, covenant, and cosmic structure — mediated through your interpretive grid. Yet faithful Christian teaching has always made a careful distinction between what is ancient and what is apostolic. Not everything old is authoritative. Not every preserved text is inspired. A ruin may be ancient; that does not make it a cathedral.

The irony is that faithful Christianity is itself the great defender of ancient wisdom, but it does not defend it as an archaeological collection. It defends it as a living inheritance. The faith is not a scroll archive but a sacramental civilization. The “permanent patterns” are not secured by multiplying texts but by preserving truth through worship, doctrine, moral teaching, and apostolic succession. A library alone cannot save a culture. A living Church sometimes can.

Your contrast between hierarchy and modern flattening also needs refinement. You are right that reality has structure. Creation is not a democratic committee. But faithful Christian teaching does not present hierarchy as cosmic control architecture; it presents it as ordered service under God. The highest in the Kingdom kneels lowest. Authority exists not to extract but to give — which is why the central image of faithful Christianity is not a throne but a Cross. When hierarchy is severed from sacrifice, it becomes tyranny whether ancient or modern.

You speak as though modernity deleted sacred order and installed the Algorithm as a rival liturgy. There is insight there, but also exaggeration. Technology can deform attention; it can also extend charity, knowledge, and connection. The faithful Christian view of tools has always been morally discriminating rather than mythically alarmed. The printing press spread both heresy and Scripture. The network spreads both confusion and truth. Babel is not silicon; it is pride.

Then there is your recurring appeal to the 81-book canon as operating manual, cosmic map, and warfare guide. Here again, the claim outruns the case. Faithful Christianity does not fear broader ancient literature; it reads much of it profitably. But it does not mistake contextual illumination for binding revelation. The canon recognized by the historic Church is not a truncated survival kit; it is a sufficient proclamation of salvation. The purpose of Scripture is not to provide a complete cosmological control panel; it is to make us wise unto salvation in Christ. When a text collection is promoted from witness to weapon system, we are already drifting from faithful Christian teaching into esoteric strategy.

You warn that without roots, people are easily programmed. That is true, and it is precisely why faithful Christianity roots believers not merely in texts but in a teaching community that spans centuries. The paradox you resist is the one you most need: authority is not the enemy of rootedness but one of its chief safeguards. A man alone with ancient books and a strong interpretive lens is not necessarily anchored; he may simply be self-authorized.

The deepest correction, though, is this: ancient wisdom is not the only weapon left. It is not even the primary one. The primary weapon of faithful Christianity is grace — carried through truth, sacrament, repentance, and sanctity. The decisive victories in Christian history were not won by those with the largest textual arsenal but by saints; they were men and women conformed to Christ. Empires have fallen to monks with nothing but prayer, doctrine, and charity rightly lived. That is not romanticism; it is record.

You are right that we should not go forward by amputating memory. But neither should we go forward by absolutizing one stream of antiquity and turning it into a master key for every modern lock. The past is a lamp, not a lever. It gives light so we may walk, not control so we may dominate.

The way forward is not nostalgia, and it is not insurgency by canon expansion. It is fidelity to the truth once delivered to the saints, faithfully taught, faithfully lived, and faithfully handed on. That path is older than any algorithm and stronger than any system of extraction, because it does not merely align with the grain of the universe. It was spoken into existence by its Maker.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?