See also the synthetic biology and toxins that mirror real venomous snakes. Or the evidence of SV40, DNA contamination, parasites and hydra in the life blood.
Not to mention the self assembling nanotechnology, BLE, MAC addresses, all to unleash the Beast System.
All tools of Satan to deceive, destroy, and bring forth a dystopian future.
But we have the authority through Jesus to say no and persevere.
Rocka, I agree with one instinct in your post: Christians should not treat the body as disposable, should not confuse technological power with moral progress, and should oppose any “upgrade” narrative that treats human persons as raw material to be optimized. The Catholic tradition has been warning about that temptation for two millennia, because it is a perennial form of pride.
But the argument you build here is not credible on logical, historical, scriptural, theological, or scientific grounds. It is not that you are asking the wrong moral questions. It is that you are trying to force those questions into a speculative cosmology that cannot bear the weight you place on it.
First, your method is logically invalid. You move from “a text says X” to “X explains the origin and trajectory of modern technology,” and then you treat disagreement as proof that others are “missing the framework.” That is circular. If a premise is contestable, you do not get to insulate it by declaring it “intel” and then treating the absence of corroboration as evidence of suppression. That is how conspiracy reasoning works: every missing link becomes proof of a cover-up. Serious argument requires falsifiable claims and independent evidence, not self-sealing explanations.
Second, the historical claims about 1 Enoch are overstated and inaccurate. It is simply false that “the Book of Enoch was Scripture for the first three centuries of Christianity” in any universal sense. Some early Christian writers valued it and sometimes spoke of it with respect; others rejected it; and, most importantly, it was never received as part of the Church’s common liturgical canon across the apostolic sees. The Church’s canon did not “delete” Enoch to protect empire. The canon clarified which books had apostolic provenance and universal reception. A text can be influential, quoted, and even convey a true prophecy without being inspired Scripture in its entirety. Jude’s citation does not magically canonize every Enochic section, any more than Paul’s citations canonize Greek poets, or a truthful statement by Caiaphas canonizes Caiaphas.
Third, your demonology contradicts the Catholic faith and the broader patristic tradition. You assert as fact that “demons are the disembodied spirits of dead Nephilim.” That is not Christian doctrine. In Catholic teaching, demons are fallen angels: purely spiritual creatures who rebelled against God. They are not the ghosts of hybrid bodies. You can cite Enoch’s internal claims, but you cannot present them as “the documented explanation Christianity lost,” because the Church never held them as the rule of faith. When you build an entire spiritual-warfare framework on a premise the Church does not and never did teach, you are no longer “recovering lost Christianity.” You are proposing an alternative religion that borrows Christian vocabulary.
Fourth, your biblical handling of Genesis 6 is tendentious. The “sons of God” passage has been interpreted in more than one way in the Christian tradition (angelic beings, the line of Seth, tyrant-kings, etc.). The Church has not dogmatized a single reading, precisely because Scripture does not force the elaborate machinery you are importing. Genesis does not name Azazel, does not describe metallurgy lessons, does not define demons as Nephilim spirits, and does not establish your causal chain from antimony eyeliner to AI chips. You are reading a later apocalyptic elaboration back into the canonical text, then treating that elaboration as the master key to history.
Fifth, the scientific and anthropological claims collapse under basic scrutiny. Metallurgy was not “introduced around 3000 BC by angels.” Copper smelting and early metallurgy predate 3000 BC by millennia in multiple regions, with gradual development across cultures. The same is true of cosmetics, pharmacology, and astronomy/astrology: these arise in human societies through incremental discovery, trade, and experimentation. You can argue that technology can be used sinfully (of course), but you cannot credibly claim that bronze, makeup, medicine, and celestial observation are evidence of a single non-human curriculum without independent evidence. You offer none. You also conflate fundamentally different domains: therapeutic medicine versus enhancement-as-salvation; responsible research versus eugenic selection; ethical medicine versus exploitative industry. Those distinctions matter if you want truth rather than rhetoric.
Sixth, your moral framing repeatedly commits a category mistake: you treat “transcending biological limits” as intrinsically demonic. Christianity does not. If it did, glasses, antibiotics, anesthesia, pacemakers, organ transplants, and every form of medicine would be rebellion. The Catholic moral tradition draws a careful line: we may pursue healing and genuine therapy that respects the integrity of the person; we must reject eugenics, embryo destruction, coercive enhancement, and any project that treats human beings as products, property, or platforms. The question is not “technology: yes/no.” The question is whether the technology serves the human person, respects moral law, and honors the unity of body and soul.
Seventh, the most serious theological flaw is your attempt to ground ethics in an unverifiable mythic history rather than in Christ and the natural moral law. You do not need Watchers to condemn embryo selection and destruction. You do not need Azazel to condemn the commodification of children. You do not need hybrid giants to warn against oligarchic greed. Catholic Christianity already has a coherent and far stronger basis: the imago Dei, the sanctity of every human life from conception, the inseparability of personhood from embodiment, and the truth that salvation is God’s gift, not a technical achievement. When you make the ethical case depend on Enochic literalism, you actually weaken the argument and hand skeptics an easy dismissal.
Finally, the “scientific” prophecy you imply about mind-uploading, neural laces, and disembodied consciousness is speculative and often incoherent. A human person is not software that can be copied into a server without remainder. Even on natural grounds, identity, consciousness, and embodied cognition are not reducible to data transfer. On Christian grounds, the soul is not an emergent property of circuitry. It is spiritual, created by God, and the human vocation is not escape from the body but resurrection of the body. Your conclusion gestures toward this, but your argument undermines it by mixing Christian eschatology with an alternate mythology of demons-as-Nephilim-spirits and a grand technological genealogy you cannot substantiate.
If you want to warn people about transhumanism, do it on solid ground. The solid ground exists.
Here is the Catholic critique, and it does not require speculative angel-tech narratives: human life is not a product; embryos are persons, not inventory; genetic manipulation that destroys or selects persons is gravely immoral; enhancement projects that commodify the body or collapse the meaning of sex and procreation into manufacturing violate human dignity; coercive bio-surveillance and brain-interface control systems threaten freedom and moral agency; and the dream of conquering death by technique is an ancient temptation because it substitutes power for grace.
That is already a complete argument: logically coherent, historically grounded, scientifically literate, and theologically orthodox. It can be preached publicly without mythic scaffolding. It can stand up under scrutiny. It can actually persuade.
So my plea is simple. Keep the moral seriousness. Keep the defense of embodiment. Keep the warning against hubris. But stop asking people to accept an entire alternative cosmology as the price of agreement. The faith does not need manufactured revelation to confront modern sins. Christ, the apostles, the canon actually received by the Church, and the moral law written on the heart are enough.
This is the kind of knowledge that should be taught in modern churches instead of the garbage that keeps people ignorant of this evil.
I would like to know how many current Christians even know the book of Enoch exists. I’m guessing that it’s few.
The bread and circus that exists to distract people away from this foundational knowledge is unreal. The temptations dangled in front of humans seem irresistible to the ignorant. Can the world be redeemed at this point? Has it been so corrupted that only the return of Christ can wipe away the evil?
I see the pattern clearly and have for some time now. People never seem to take me seriously when I try to relate this even in general terms.
The hubris of always “improving” on Gods creation makes me both sad and angry. Gods plan is perfect!
Transhumansim, is beyond even this.. it is Mankind's Arrogance, Ego, Pride, Etc, Etc, to keep living, within the completely reprehensible structure, they have created and implemented! To enslave humanity, forever at their feet!! To ensure the so called "elites" maintain complete and utter control over ALL.. So they can continue their abominations, unchecked and unchallenged.. From organ harvesting to robotics.. from cloning & All other forms of despicable conduct.. That they wish to make forever.. All i shall say is that The Most High God? I believe he has completely different plans!! And his will? There is no questioning or debating HIS WILL!!! HIS WILL SHALL BE DONE!!! HIS GREAT WORKS? ARE THE ONLY GREAT WORKS!! PERIOD.. And I do not care what they have planned.. Thy Kingdom come, Thy WILL BE DONE.. AMEN
very interesting, and I can agree with (or see your point) on nearly all.
I would modify the definition of demons, though -- remembering Paul wrote that we deal with principalities and powers etc, and bearing in mind that the spirits of the Watchers are held elsewhere, in prison ; so they're not allowed to interact with us at present. thank goodness.
But yes I can say the 1/3rd of angels, who at the beginning were assigned places under the authority of Lucifer, did decide to follow Him-- & as a result became corrupted and are what we know as "demons".
I do not know (& won't venture to speculate) if the 300 Watchers will be released upon us before the final return of messiah Yeshua. I think the nasties already among us are quite capable of causing trouble without the Watchers...
a question: I notice the first being (Watcher, former angel) is named Azazel. I wonder if that's the same Azazel to whomever one of the goats of Yom Kippur are given?
Refreshing erudite essay. I haven’t studied transhumanism much, but after we vacationed near CERN I did a bit of research. I had assumed the conspiracy theories about it to be sort of goofy, and lots of them are, but one lady I saw on a YouTube video, Dr Astrid Stuckelberger seems credible. She’s not a physicist and doesn’t work at CERN, but lives in Geneva and has, according to her, contacts within CERN who claim they have opened a portal and are communicating with “intelligences” on the other side. I think she also says these “beings” are “frequency-based and are using CERN's infrastructure to integrate with our world's digital systems (AI).” Maybe it’s nothing, but it did give me pause.
I recently finished reading the Dune trilogy - Dune - Dune Messiah - Children of Dune.
Fascinating when considered through the lens of this Enochian framework. It’s a deep dive into an advanced human civilization that has successfully avoided the temptation of transhumanism via the Azazel path (the Butlerian Jihad abolished all computers, and all functions previously provided by computers were fulfilled by human Mentats) and the Kasdeja path (the Bene Gesserit engaged in genetic manipulation via “old fashioned” methods, ie. breeding specific bloodlines over generations to preserve desired genetics and produce their Kwisatz Haderach).
But they fell deep into transhumanist temptation with the Semjaza path. Their entire way of life, their social fabric, all their corruptions and progress was entirely reliant on and caused by the cognitive enhancements of the spice of Arrakis.
The Watcher playbook unfolds even in this fictional universe entirely different from our own.
Brilliant piece- yes, interesting how the Watchers really unable to create instead introducing & teaching various cancers to destroy an order that was perfect.
Removing this from the story all but destroys our ability to understand what God's judgment of the "wicked" is all about. Redemption through Christ in the new covenant is flattened out when we no longer realize we are meant to claim position, power and authority in this war against God's enemies by the transforming work of the Holy Spirit in us.
The MOST HIGH GOD, has been LIGHT YEARS AHEAD, OF THEIR WICKED PLANS!!
I recommend people get right with God immediately.. and people should not waste time, trying to understand how he works.. but of how to bear fruits for HIM!! Take it for what you shall..
Excellent analysis on Transhumanism
As in the Days of Noah…
They sinned against the animals.
See also the synthetic biology and toxins that mirror real venomous snakes. Or the evidence of SV40, DNA contamination, parasites and hydra in the life blood.
Not to mention the self assembling nanotechnology, BLE, MAC addresses, all to unleash the Beast System.
All tools of Satan to deceive, destroy, and bring forth a dystopian future.
But we have the authority through Jesus to say no and persevere.
Rocka, I agree with one instinct in your post: Christians should not treat the body as disposable, should not confuse technological power with moral progress, and should oppose any “upgrade” narrative that treats human persons as raw material to be optimized. The Catholic tradition has been warning about that temptation for two millennia, because it is a perennial form of pride.
But the argument you build here is not credible on logical, historical, scriptural, theological, or scientific grounds. It is not that you are asking the wrong moral questions. It is that you are trying to force those questions into a speculative cosmology that cannot bear the weight you place on it.
First, your method is logically invalid. You move from “a text says X” to “X explains the origin and trajectory of modern technology,” and then you treat disagreement as proof that others are “missing the framework.” That is circular. If a premise is contestable, you do not get to insulate it by declaring it “intel” and then treating the absence of corroboration as evidence of suppression. That is how conspiracy reasoning works: every missing link becomes proof of a cover-up. Serious argument requires falsifiable claims and independent evidence, not self-sealing explanations.
Second, the historical claims about 1 Enoch are overstated and inaccurate. It is simply false that “the Book of Enoch was Scripture for the first three centuries of Christianity” in any universal sense. Some early Christian writers valued it and sometimes spoke of it with respect; others rejected it; and, most importantly, it was never received as part of the Church’s common liturgical canon across the apostolic sees. The Church’s canon did not “delete” Enoch to protect empire. The canon clarified which books had apostolic provenance and universal reception. A text can be influential, quoted, and even convey a true prophecy without being inspired Scripture in its entirety. Jude’s citation does not magically canonize every Enochic section, any more than Paul’s citations canonize Greek poets, or a truthful statement by Caiaphas canonizes Caiaphas.
Third, your demonology contradicts the Catholic faith and the broader patristic tradition. You assert as fact that “demons are the disembodied spirits of dead Nephilim.” That is not Christian doctrine. In Catholic teaching, demons are fallen angels: purely spiritual creatures who rebelled against God. They are not the ghosts of hybrid bodies. You can cite Enoch’s internal claims, but you cannot present them as “the documented explanation Christianity lost,” because the Church never held them as the rule of faith. When you build an entire spiritual-warfare framework on a premise the Church does not and never did teach, you are no longer “recovering lost Christianity.” You are proposing an alternative religion that borrows Christian vocabulary.
Fourth, your biblical handling of Genesis 6 is tendentious. The “sons of God” passage has been interpreted in more than one way in the Christian tradition (angelic beings, the line of Seth, tyrant-kings, etc.). The Church has not dogmatized a single reading, precisely because Scripture does not force the elaborate machinery you are importing. Genesis does not name Azazel, does not describe metallurgy lessons, does not define demons as Nephilim spirits, and does not establish your causal chain from antimony eyeliner to AI chips. You are reading a later apocalyptic elaboration back into the canonical text, then treating that elaboration as the master key to history.
Fifth, the scientific and anthropological claims collapse under basic scrutiny. Metallurgy was not “introduced around 3000 BC by angels.” Copper smelting and early metallurgy predate 3000 BC by millennia in multiple regions, with gradual development across cultures. The same is true of cosmetics, pharmacology, and astronomy/astrology: these arise in human societies through incremental discovery, trade, and experimentation. You can argue that technology can be used sinfully (of course), but you cannot credibly claim that bronze, makeup, medicine, and celestial observation are evidence of a single non-human curriculum without independent evidence. You offer none. You also conflate fundamentally different domains: therapeutic medicine versus enhancement-as-salvation; responsible research versus eugenic selection; ethical medicine versus exploitative industry. Those distinctions matter if you want truth rather than rhetoric.
Sixth, your moral framing repeatedly commits a category mistake: you treat “transcending biological limits” as intrinsically demonic. Christianity does not. If it did, glasses, antibiotics, anesthesia, pacemakers, organ transplants, and every form of medicine would be rebellion. The Catholic moral tradition draws a careful line: we may pursue healing and genuine therapy that respects the integrity of the person; we must reject eugenics, embryo destruction, coercive enhancement, and any project that treats human beings as products, property, or platforms. The question is not “technology: yes/no.” The question is whether the technology serves the human person, respects moral law, and honors the unity of body and soul.
Seventh, the most serious theological flaw is your attempt to ground ethics in an unverifiable mythic history rather than in Christ and the natural moral law. You do not need Watchers to condemn embryo selection and destruction. You do not need Azazel to condemn the commodification of children. You do not need hybrid giants to warn against oligarchic greed. Catholic Christianity already has a coherent and far stronger basis: the imago Dei, the sanctity of every human life from conception, the inseparability of personhood from embodiment, and the truth that salvation is God’s gift, not a technical achievement. When you make the ethical case depend on Enochic literalism, you actually weaken the argument and hand skeptics an easy dismissal.
Finally, the “scientific” prophecy you imply about mind-uploading, neural laces, and disembodied consciousness is speculative and often incoherent. A human person is not software that can be copied into a server without remainder. Even on natural grounds, identity, consciousness, and embodied cognition are not reducible to data transfer. On Christian grounds, the soul is not an emergent property of circuitry. It is spiritual, created by God, and the human vocation is not escape from the body but resurrection of the body. Your conclusion gestures toward this, but your argument undermines it by mixing Christian eschatology with an alternate mythology of demons-as-Nephilim-spirits and a grand technological genealogy you cannot substantiate.
If you want to warn people about transhumanism, do it on solid ground. The solid ground exists.
Here is the Catholic critique, and it does not require speculative angel-tech narratives: human life is not a product; embryos are persons, not inventory; genetic manipulation that destroys or selects persons is gravely immoral; enhancement projects that commodify the body or collapse the meaning of sex and procreation into manufacturing violate human dignity; coercive bio-surveillance and brain-interface control systems threaten freedom and moral agency; and the dream of conquering death by technique is an ancient temptation because it substitutes power for grace.
That is already a complete argument: logically coherent, historically grounded, scientifically literate, and theologically orthodox. It can be preached publicly without mythic scaffolding. It can stand up under scrutiny. It can actually persuade.
So my plea is simple. Keep the moral seriousness. Keep the defense of embodiment. Keep the warning against hubris. But stop asking people to accept an entire alternative cosmology as the price of agreement. The faith does not need manufactured revelation to confront modern sins. Christ, the apostles, the canon actually received by the Church, and the moral law written on the heart are enough.
This is the kind of knowledge that should be taught in modern churches instead of the garbage that keeps people ignorant of this evil.
I would like to know how many current Christians even know the book of Enoch exists. I’m guessing that it’s few.
The bread and circus that exists to distract people away from this foundational knowledge is unreal. The temptations dangled in front of humans seem irresistible to the ignorant. Can the world be redeemed at this point? Has it been so corrupted that only the return of Christ can wipe away the evil?
I see the pattern clearly and have for some time now. People never seem to take me seriously when I try to relate this even in general terms.
The hubris of always “improving” on Gods creation makes me both sad and angry. Gods plan is perfect!
God’s plan is perfect!
Hey Rocka! I just published my work on transhumanism last year as well. Looking forward to reading yours and seeing what you’ve discovered!
https://open.substack.com/pub/warriorgardenacademy/p/they-want-you-to-upload-your-mind?r=4kiqzi&utm_medium=ios&shareImageVariant=overlay
Transhumansim, is beyond even this.. it is Mankind's Arrogance, Ego, Pride, Etc, Etc, to keep living, within the completely reprehensible structure, they have created and implemented! To enslave humanity, forever at their feet!! To ensure the so called "elites" maintain complete and utter control over ALL.. So they can continue their abominations, unchecked and unchallenged.. From organ harvesting to robotics.. from cloning & All other forms of despicable conduct.. That they wish to make forever.. All i shall say is that The Most High God? I believe he has completely different plans!! And his will? There is no questioning or debating HIS WILL!!! HIS WILL SHALL BE DONE!!! HIS GREAT WORKS? ARE THE ONLY GREAT WORKS!! PERIOD.. And I do not care what they have planned.. Thy Kingdom come, Thy WILL BE DONE.. AMEN
very interesting, and I can agree with (or see your point) on nearly all.
I would modify the definition of demons, though -- remembering Paul wrote that we deal with principalities and powers etc, and bearing in mind that the spirits of the Watchers are held elsewhere, in prison ; so they're not allowed to interact with us at present. thank goodness.
But yes I can say the 1/3rd of angels, who at the beginning were assigned places under the authority of Lucifer, did decide to follow Him-- & as a result became corrupted and are what we know as "demons".
I do not know (& won't venture to speculate) if the 300 Watchers will be released upon us before the final return of messiah Yeshua. I think the nasties already among us are quite capable of causing trouble without the Watchers...
a question: I notice the first being (Watcher, former angel) is named Azazel. I wonder if that's the same Azazel to whomever one of the goats of Yom Kippur are given?
(see leviticus 16 verse 26)
can't edit this, but auto correct made a big mistake when it capitalized the H in Him; i was NOT referring there to God, but rather to Lucifer :-(
🤔
Refreshing erudite essay. I haven’t studied transhumanism much, but after we vacationed near CERN I did a bit of research. I had assumed the conspiracy theories about it to be sort of goofy, and lots of them are, but one lady I saw on a YouTube video, Dr Astrid Stuckelberger seems credible. She’s not a physicist and doesn’t work at CERN, but lives in Geneva and has, according to her, contacts within CERN who claim they have opened a portal and are communicating with “intelligences” on the other side. I think she also says these “beings” are “frequency-based and are using CERN's infrastructure to integrate with our world's digital systems (AI).” Maybe it’s nothing, but it did give me pause.
Do you think chat gpt is part of this and we should not use it at all?
The danger isn’t using technology. The danger is who uses it, for what ends, and without limits.
I recently finished reading the Dune trilogy - Dune - Dune Messiah - Children of Dune.
Fascinating when considered through the lens of this Enochian framework. It’s a deep dive into an advanced human civilization that has successfully avoided the temptation of transhumanism via the Azazel path (the Butlerian Jihad abolished all computers, and all functions previously provided by computers were fulfilled by human Mentats) and the Kasdeja path (the Bene Gesserit engaged in genetic manipulation via “old fashioned” methods, ie. breeding specific bloodlines over generations to preserve desired genetics and produce their Kwisatz Haderach).
But they fell deep into transhumanist temptation with the Semjaza path. Their entire way of life, their social fabric, all their corruptions and progress was entirely reliant on and caused by the cognitive enhancements of the spice of Arrakis.
The Watcher playbook unfolds even in this fictional universe entirely different from our own.
Brilliant piece- yes, interesting how the Watchers really unable to create instead introducing & teaching various cancers to destroy an order that was perfect.
Removing this from the story all but destroys our ability to understand what God's judgment of the "wicked" is all about. Redemption through Christ in the new covenant is flattened out when we no longer realize we are meant to claim position, power and authority in this war against God's enemies by the transforming work of the Holy Spirit in us.
Do you think Hitler emerged as an avatar of transhumanism in the mid 20th century to advance an aryan race construct using eugenics as the impetus?
The demons thesis unlocked everything for me too. Once you see it you can't unsee the pattern repeating.
The MOST HIGH GOD, has been LIGHT YEARS AHEAD, OF THEIR WICKED PLANS!!
I recommend people get right with God immediately.. and people should not waste time, trying to understand how he works.. but of how to bear fruits for HIM!! Take it for what you shall..